(Ep-2) Why Strategy Testing Should Start With a Small Trading Account

(A $100 Trading Experiment – Episode 2)

For a long time, I believed that a trading strategy had to be tested with meaningful capital.
The logic seemed obvious: if it doesn’t work with real money, it doesn’t work at all.

But after more than a year of live trading, I’ve come to a different conclusion.

The size of the account is not what proves a strategy.
The behavior of the trader does.

That realization is what led me to start this $100 trading experiment.

---

The Hidden Problem With Testing on Large Accounts

When traders test new strategies on large accounts, two things usually happen:

1. Emotional pressure increases
2. Execution quality decreases

Even experienced traders are not immune.

A strategy may look solid on paper, but once real size is involved:

• Stops are delayed
• Losses are avoided instead of accepted
• Risk rules are bent “just this once”

At that point, you are no longer testing the strategy.
You are testing your emotions.

---

Why a Small Account Reveals the Truth

A small account removes unnecessary psychological weight.

With a $100 account:

• Losses are tolerable
• Stops are easier to execute
• Decisions become cleaner and more objective

This allows one crucial thing to happen:

The strategy is tested as designed, not as emotionally modified.

If a method cannot be executed properly on a small account,
it will not magically work better on a larger one.

---

This Is Not About Turning $100 Into a Fortune

This experiment is often misunderstood.

The goal is not to grow $100 aggressively or to chase unrealistic returns.
It is not a “flip $100 to $10,000” challenge.

The real purpose is to answer these questions:

• Can this strategy survive repeated losses?
• Can it be executed consistently without hesitation?
• Can it avoid catastrophic liquidation risk?
• Can it be sustained over time?

A small account is simply the most honest environment to find those answers.

---

Consistency Matters More Than Capital

Many traders focus on scaling capital too early.

But capital only amplifies what already exists:

• Good discipline becomes stronger
• Bad habits become more expensive

That’s why I believe strategy validation must come first.

A strategy that works cleanly on a $100 account
can later be scaled with confidence and control.

---

What Comes Next

This $100 trading experiment will continue as a documented process.

In upcoming posts, I’ll share:

• Actual trade records
• Stop-loss execution examples
• Account rotation logic
• What works, and what doesn’t

No hype.
No shortcuts.
Just data, discipline, and observation.

If you’re interested in sustainable trading rather than quick wins,
you’re welcome to follow along.

---

Final Thoughts

Small accounts are often dismissed as meaningless.

I see them differently.

They are where bad strategies fail fast,
and good strategies reveal themselves quietly.

That is exactly why this experiment starts here.